May 31, 2013 — Water covers nearly 71 percent of Earth, yet we know more about deep space than the deep ocean. Sylvia Earle aims to change that. An oceanographer, explorer, author and lecturer, she has spent most of her life studying what lies below the surface. Ensia sat down with this legend of the sea for an eye-opening discussion of why the oceans truly matter to the health of the planet, and us.
It got me thinking, in what way do we stack up the knowledge about the two?
Physics:
Vacum Vs. Water - Two me, it seems like astrophysics and the physics of fluids are both well understood, there are still some questions in astrophysics, like what dark matter and dark energy is, and maybe there are things about the physics of oceans that we do not yet grasp... so, I'd say at most, they are an even match.
Biology:
We know of thousands of marine organisms, there are plenty more to find and study. While on the other hand, we know of no life beyond our planet. We can't even rule out if life has developed on other planets and moons in our solar system, yet alone the rest of the universe.
Mapping:
We are actively mapping both the ocean floor and the skies, I'd guess that an accurate view of the terrain of the ocean floor is far simpler to map out.
When it comes to sheer size, the earth's oceans is like an atom on a dust particle (earth) in a mega stadium (the universe). Now, that atom (the ocean) is part of home and should in my opinion get it's share of attention. But I've never understood the thought behind the saying that deep space is better known than the oceans.