March 23, 2015 — To say the world has changed a lot in the last century is a huge understatement. Industrial, medical and social progress has resulted in unprecedented growth in the world’s population and economy, and that growth has placed tremendous burdens on the planet’s resources. These burdens create problems — perhaps the most substantive problems we have faced as a species: from water scarcity and pollution to climate change, reliable access to nourishing food, and affordable energy.
Here’s the thing, though: where there are problems to be solved, there’s money to be made. And where there’s money to be made, we awaken one of the world’s most powerful forces for change: capitalism.
Of course capitalism has played a starring role in distressing the planet’s resources. Historically, the combination of unchecked industry, a readiness to externalize costs and a relentless thirst for growth have plundered and polluted the earth. It’s not a debate, but simple fact that our population size and economies cannot continue on their present trajectories without exhausting the world’s resources. Yet, a rapidly expanding global middle class — increasingly urbanized and hungry for protein — threatens further and accelerating distress.
The hopeful news is that businesses, with their almost singular focus on economic self-interest, and governments, motivated by a variety of interests, are beginning to recognize and address in earnest these inevitable problems.
Today, the businesses that develop practical and affordable solutions to burdened resource problems will end up being the world’s most profitable companies. No longer can they be considered “sustainability” businesses. They are everyday businesses with a long view, targeting problems that are not going away. That’s smart business. Burdened resources have become a strong economic driver for businesses of all sizes, in all industries everywhere to spend and change — and one that will only grow in scope and intensity over time.
Too often people have a narrow view of these solutions, thinking only of solar panels and windmills. But solutions are enormously diverse.
The companies that provide effective solutions to burdened resources will provide superior risk-adjusted returns to their investors as business and governments accelerate their solutions spending out of their own economic self-interest. And because the products, technologies and services these companies provide are common solutions to global problems — and are therefore exponentially repeatable — these investments will have amplified positive impact on global resource scarcity issues.
Too often people have a narrow view of these solutions, thinking only of solar panels and windmills. But solutions are enormously diverse: They include, among many others, agricultural drones that monitor soil conditions, smart irrigation technology that delivers water only where and when it’s really needed, more efficient distributed energy generation and component suppliers that make cars use less gas.
We face a new reality in which our economic self-interest and the long-term well-being of the planet are coming into alignment.
As a whole, the human race has a poor track record when it comes to altruism. Although there are a great many saints among us who spend — and even sacrifice — their lives to help others, most of us are hard pressed to take care of ourselves and our families. We have a much better track record when it comes to investing money in our own self- interest, which has fueled the unprecedented innovation, economic and life-expectancy growth of the past century.
In the past, many people who invested in sustainable solutions were motivated principally by conscience, willing to accept reduced returns in order to invest their money in a way that was consistent with their beliefs and convictions — be they religious, social or environmental. Now, however, we face a new reality in which our economic self-interest and the long-term well-being of the planet are coming into alignment. Because we have to face the reality of burdened resources, there’s money in it.
Recently, some asset managers have based investments on environmental, social and governance screening, betting that good corporate citizens are inherently better-managed companies, which will therefore be more profitable over time. Increasingly, however, ESG screening is becoming more pervasive and will likely over time become commonplace, robbing this sort of screening as a differentiator when making investment decisions.
The primary goal for investing in sustainable solutions is to achieve superior risk-adjusted returns. Companies that provide solutions to the issues of burdened resources will be the recipients of a massive global spend cycle, no matter one’s motivation. The fact that one’s investment is also part of the solution rather than the problem is worth getting excited about. Self-interest is what moves markets. According to McKinsey’s report, How to make Green Growth the new normal, “In order to mobilize the US$3 trillion a year that will be needed to build a resource-efficient growth model, investing in the markets of the future needs to be seen as possessing superior risk-return characteristics.”
No government subsidy or charity case can move the needle for long. Only capitalism has the power to retool industries, reshape economies and rebuild infrastructure across the planet. It’s a big part of what got us into this mess, but it’s also what will get us out.
Editor’s note: The views expressed here are those of the author and not necessarily of Ensia. We present them to further discussion around important topics. We encourage you to respond with a comment below, following our commenting guidelines, which can be found here. In addition, you might consider submitting a Voices piece of your own. See Ensia’s “Contact” page for submission guidelines.
Ensia shares solutions-focused stories free of charge through our online magazine and partner media. That means audiences around the world have ready access to stories that can — and do — help them shape a better future. If you value our work, please show your support today.
Yes, I'll support Ensia!
Change has to happen yesterday. The current Capitalist model is a failure as there is no protection for the less fortunate around the planet.
I often wonder if the people running these corporations have families. What kind of legacy will be left. The insane belief that money is the driving force of life. There will be very few resources left, that can be used, by 2030. Those who create the problems are not the ones to solve them. It is a matter for major change in attitudes of both Corporate business and Governments. If we are to find any real positive change. Everyone will have to accept less.
Interesting to see your comments on solar and wind. These options are part of the solution and they could supply energy to major areas of the planet. Unfortunately mass production of food is a failure. Leaving massive areas of land depleted of any life. Remember the dust bowl.
There are agricultural models already in place that if encouraged and used woulds turn the food issue around. At the same time protecting the environment. Your suggestion of increased irrigation would be a failure other than local and short term. There is not enough usable water in the places it is needed for this system. And drones to monitor the soil? The soil will recover once it is allowed to recover from the BigAg destructive methods of farming.
I would recommend a couple of books by Peter Andrews (Australian Farmer) "Back from the Brink" & "Beyond the Brink".
I could go on but I am sure you have the picture. If you want your family to have the best life, and I am sure you do, then get off the money trail. Creating a quality of life worth having will take some short term changes, but in the long run for the better. If the stock markets and banks are allowed to continue playing with money the way they do, 2008 will seem just like an off day. There is too much to lose by following the system you are suggesting. If we chose to change now, it will be a softer landing. If we continue in the belief that money is the thing that motivates people, you have been sadly mislead and live in a rather small and sad world. An implosion is imminent.
"All things must pass."
Thank you for your time. Let us hope there is a solution for more people other than just the ones who are motivated to action by money. To inspire others to act carries a higher value than financial gain in itself. Altruistic, one might even dare to say!
I would recommend a couple of books by Peter Andrews (Australian Farmer) "Back from the Brink" & "Beyond the Brink".
Also worth a look. Part of his story.
http://www.abc.net.au/austory/specials/rightasrain/
We need more people like him. Who works with practical solutions.
Wrong. As a whole, humanity has a fantastic record of altruism if you account for its entire, nearly 3 million year history. It's societies that require people to act first out of self interest for their security that have a problem with altruism.
Its so frustrating that people continue this meme about humans being inherently flawed, inherently unsustainble as a species, as this severely limits the way we think about our options, with this article being an effective case in point.
He states that capitalism is responsible for "plundering and polluting the earth." Bad history there, because irresponsible and destructive behavior is historically the product of government policies protecting the irresponsible. Governments and state-owned companies and state-protected companies are historically the worst polluters.
Since the late 18th Century, world population has risen sixfold. This explosion was made possible by a productivity explosion - a resource explosion, a food explosion, an information explosion, a communications explosion, a science explosion, and a medical explosion.
The result was that the sixfold increase in world population was dwarfed by an eighty-fold increase in world output. As real incomes rose, more people were able to live, more people were able to live longer and healthier lives. Infant mortality rates plummeted and life expectancies soared. In 1900 the average world life expectancy was about 30 years. In 1993 it was just over 65 years. Nearly 80 percent of the increase in world life expectancy has taken place in just those 90 years! That is arguably one of the single most astonishing accomplishments in the history of humanity. It is also one of the least noted.
And it is the accomplishment of free markets - capitalism.
So if you are worried about resource depletion, just get out of the way and private entrepreneurial action will show you how resources are discovered, recovered, and put to profitable use.
If you are worried about pollution, don't protect the polluters, but do allow technology to advance. You will observe that technology improves over time, in ways that are not anticipated, not planned, and not directed, that processes get cleaner and more efficient, that companies who don't keep up get left behind, that air and water get cleaner as a result.
Watch as technology and information flow and economics wean people from dependence on personal automobiles - Uber, Lyft, self-driving, programmable cars, internet delivery services, etc., ad infinitum, are reducing the need for fossil fuels. On the other hand, a large percentage of the world is still without electricity, so light them up, let those people enjoy better lives.
Free people who are allowed to be creative and to reap the rewards from successfully supplying what people want and need, will see opportunities and solve what others see as problems, while pursuing profits [a wonderfully positive word], in the win-win process that all market transactions depend upon.
The alternative, is to empower governments, acting through politicians and bureaucrats and police, to tax, to waste stolen resources on subsidies to the politically correct and the politically connected, to coerce, punish, direct, and control our lives, based on their limited vision, and their limited tools - laws and guns.
Governments can only act through coercion, and that is never a remedy for problems which require creative solutions.
Capitalism unleashes the genius of free markets.
In the US, for example, environmental consciousness itself was sparked by people like Rachel Carson ("Silent Spring") and many others involved in rousing public pressure to put a stop to capitalist/corporate waste and pollution of the environment.
Activism, often by people most directly and immanently affected by corporate devastation, has historically been the most powerful force to "save the planet."
The idea that businesses will do so because they now have a profit motive to do so is circular logic: because then when they "save the planet" the profit motive will return to bankrupting it so that there is another profit motive. Hence, no progress, just the same situation again.
Consider that the overwhelming majority of environmental protection laws in the U.S. (such "small" things as the "Clean Water Act" and the "Clean Air Act," not to mention Earth Day and much, much more) were all the result of growing public pressure to STOP businesses from polluting the planet for profit.
When pigs can fly...capitalism will save the planet.
1) can meet consumer demand with no loss of capability and at an affordable pricepoint; and
2) businesses can make more profit selling those products than they can selling existing products,
tree huggers are shouting into the wind.
Luckily, we're almost there.
Albert Einstein